Drawing for AISIGHT

USPTO serial 77080183

AISIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AISIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

B. Todd Patterson

B. Todd Patterson Patterson & Sheridan, LLP3040 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 1500Houston, TX 77056UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer hardware and behavior recognition software which enables video surveillance cameras to monitor abnormal behaviorACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 26, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 8, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 4, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Aug 1, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 17, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 17, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 15, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 15, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 15, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 15, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 10, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 4, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance