USPTO serial 77080475
PARALLEL NAPA VALLEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILKE, JOHN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PARALLEL NAPA VALLEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Salt Lake City, UT
Salt Lake City, UT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randall B. Bateman
RANDALL B. BATEMAN BATEMAN IP LAW GROUP8 East Broadway, Suite 5500P.O. Box 1319SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |