USPTO serial 77080533
SIMPLY SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SIMPLY SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian G. Gilpin
BRIAN G. GILPIN GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3512UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | soaps and detergents; liquid soap; laundry detergent, namely pre-spotter, liquid fabric softener, sheet fabric softener, and liquid bleach alternatives; pet cleaners, namely pet shampoo, pet conditioner, pet deodorizer, pet stain remover, and all purpose pet product cleaners; vehicle cleaners; cleaners for use on furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | candles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Environmentally Sensitive Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Environmentally Sensitive Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named SIMPLY SAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 5, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 3, 2007 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 3, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |