CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SIMPLY SAFE

USPTO serial 77080533

SIMPLY SAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SIMPLY SAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian G. Gilpin

BRIAN G. GILPIN GODFREY & KAHN, S.C.780 N WATER STMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-3512UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003soaps and detergents; liquid soap; laundry detergent, namely pre-spotter, liquid fabric softener, sheet fabric softener, and liquid bleach alternatives; pet cleaners, namely pet shampoo, pet conditioner, pet deodorizer, pet stain remover, and all purpose pet product cleaners; vehicle cleaners; cleaners for use on furnitureACTIVE—
004candlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 23, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 18, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 27, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 26, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2009EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 5, 2008DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 5, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 17, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2008DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 7, 2007ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 15, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 21, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 3, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
May 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance