USPTO serial 77080535
SMB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Kenney
ROBERT J. KENNEY BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Geiger counters; Optical blank discs for sound or video recording; Optical character readers; recorded computer software for use of DVD (Digital Versatile Disc) product, namely, for use in improving the quality of a dual optical and magneto-optical disc players and recorders for audio, video and computer data and HD-DVD players; DVD Burner; CD Burner; recorded computer operating programs; recorded computer programs for the use of DVD products, namely, for use in improving the quality of a dual optical and magneto-optical disc players and recorders for audio, video and computer data and HD-DVD players; downloadable software for the use of DVD Digital Versatile Disc products, namely, for use in improving the quality of a dual optical and magneto-optical disc players and recorders for audio, video and computer data and HD-DVD players; Notebook computers; Laptop computers; computer mouse; Mouse pads; Microprocessors; Bar code readers; Light-emitting electronic pointers; Video game cartridges; Lasers, not for medical purposes; X-rays producing apparatus and installations, not for medical purposes; Roentgen apparatus not for medical purposes; Cyclotrons; Simulators for the steering and control of vehicles; Hydrophone machines and apparatus, namely, monitors, microphones, recorder and transmitters; Scanners; Word processors; computer workstations, comprising computers, monitors, DVD-RW; Magnetic blank disks; Magnetic encoders; Magnetic prospecting tools; Magnetic detectors; Magnetic blank tapes; Demagnetizing apparatus for magnetic tapes; Electronic notice boards; Electric heat blankets for electronic machines; electronic photocopiers; Electronic agendas; Transmitters of electronic signals; Automatic electronic door opening and closing apparatus; Electronic vending machines; Electronic pens; Electron microscopes; Central processing units, namely, video processors; Seismic exploration machines and apparatus; Ultrasonic insect killers; Ultrasonic sounders; Ultrasonic flaw detectors; Ultrasonic sensors; Computers; Computer memories; computer monitors; computer hardware; Disk drives for computers; Wrist rests for use with computers; Magnetic tape units for computers, namely, magnetic tape drive, magnetic head, control unit; Juke boxes for computers; Printers for use with computers; Computer games apparatus, namely, computer, computer software for games, computer mouse; Computer keyboards; Cable checking panels; Closed circuit boards; Plotters; Floppy blank disks; Personal Digital Assistants (PDA); Pocket calculators; Electronic pocket translators; blank read-only memory compact discs featuring blank CD-ROMS for sound or video recording | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |