Drawing for WHATEVER!

USPTO serial 77080665

WHATEVER!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WHATEVER!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen Quiroz

Kathleen Quiroz Strasburger & Price LLP711 NAVARRO, SIXTH FLOORSAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014Ankle bracelets; Bracelets; Charms; Chokers; Costume jewelry; Ear clips; Ear studs; Earrings; Jewelry; Necklaces; Ornamental pins; Rings being jewelryACTIVE—
025Belts; Blazers; Blouses; Capri pants; Capris; Caps; Caps with visors; Coats; Crop tops; Denim jackets; Dresses; Gauchos; Halter tops; Hats; Headbands; Jackets; Jeans; Lingerie; Night gowns; Overalls; Pajamas; Pants; Robes; Shawls and headscarves; Shirts; Shoes; Short sets; Shorts; Skirts; Skorts; Sleepwear; Sports shirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Tank tops; Tops; Twin setsACTIVE—
026Barrettes; Bobby pins; Braids; Clam clips for hair; Hair accessories, namely, claw clips; Hair accessories, namely, snap clips; Hair accessories, namely, twisters; Hair bands; Hair bows; Hair buckles; Hair clips; Hair curl clips; Hair extensions; Hair ornaments; Hair ornaments in the form of combs; Hair pieces; Hair pins and grips; Hair ribbons; Hair scrunchies; Oriental hair pins; Ornamental bows of textile for decoration; Ornamental ribbons made of textiles; Ponytail holders; Ribbons; Wigs; Wigs, hairpieces, and add-in and add-on hair accessories constructed primarily of synthetic and/or human hairACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 4, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 4, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 14, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 13, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 11, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 6, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 20, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 25, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 3, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 12, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 27, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 28, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 18, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 15, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 15, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 10, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 10, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 10, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 10, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 10, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 1, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 19, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance