Drawing for FEMME ARSENAL

USPTO serial 77081004

FEMME ARSENAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FEMME ARSENAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregg R. Donnenfeld, Esq.

Gregg R. Donnenfeld, Esq. Marc Ecko Enterprises40 W. 23rd Street3rd FloorNew York, NY 10010

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Sexual aids and devices, namely, devices for massaging or vibrating portions of the face and body and pacifiers for massaging the lips; adult sexual aids for aiding in copulation and masturbation, namely, reproduction of parts of the male and female anatomy, artificial penises, artificial vaginas, imitation animal sexual organs, pumps, rings, stimulators, vibrators, dildos, dongs, butt plugs, sleeves on vibrators, sleeves for vibrators, penis extensions, harnesses, masturbators, nipple clippers; body prosthesis, namely, prosthetic breasts, prosthetic penises, prosthetic vaginas, prosthetic anuses, prosthetic mouths; electrical appliances for massaging the body, and kits containing two or more of the foregoing; adult sexual aids, namely, love dolls; condomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 31, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 15, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 15, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 22, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 22, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 25, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 14, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 28, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 28, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 21, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 1, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 12, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2007PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance