USPTO serial 77081046
SPG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DeAnne Ozaki
10 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608-1009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Pre-recorded audio tapes, discs and cassettes, video tapes, digital audio and audio video tapes and discs, laser discs, and phonograph records featuring music and entertainment; theatrical and musical sound and video recordings; virtual reality game software; computer game programs; computer software featuring music; downloadable music, mp3s, graphics, games, images and videos for wireless communication devices; downloadable music, sound recordings, videos, and mp3 files; computer and video game equipment containing memory devices, namely, computer and video game software, tapes, cartridges, cassettes, joysticks and remote control units; prerecorded video cassettes, CDs, and DVDs featuring entertainment programs; prerecorded video cassettes, CDs, and DVDs featuring music and dance; video game cartridges; video game tape cassettes; video game discs; video game CD-ROMs; video game DVD-ROMs; video game software and interactive video game software; video game programs; computer game programs downloadable from the Internet; computer software all featuring music and games; audio and video recordings featuring entertainment; audio and video recordings featuring music and dance; video game interactive control floor pads; video game interactive remote control units; video game interactive remote control units; video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games; light switches; decorative magnets; safety helmets; sunglasses; eyeglasses; photographic cameras; mobile phone cases; mouse pads; compact disc holders; downloadable ring tone recordings and downloadable software for use in graphics and for use in games for mobile phones; swim masks; swim goggles; digital photo frames for displaying digital pictures and music; protective carrying cases for portable music players | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2008 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |