USPTO serial 77081231
BRUMBY'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRUMBY'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David P. Branfman
David P. Branfman Branfman Law Group, P.C.708 Civic Center Dr.Oceanside, CA 92054UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Bakery products; bread; bread products, namely, bread dough, bread; pastry products, namely, pastries; preparations made from cereals, namely, bread products; preparations made from bread, namely, all types of loaves and rolls in all shapes and size; preparations made from pastry, namely, croissants, danishes, and all products made from pastry; preparations made from confectionary, namely, sweet slices and tarts; pizza, pizza products, namely, pizza dough and pizza topped rolls; pies; bread products containing cooked food, namely, choppa loaves, tear and share rolls, ready rolls, pizza rolls, focaccias, herb scotch loaf, pesto and capsicum ciabatta, sundried tomato and olive pane di casa, spinach and feta damper, kalamata olive rolls; filled bread products, namely, choppa loaves, tear and share rolls, ready rolls; snack foods consisting principally of bread; stuffed bread; bread rolls (filled and/or otherwise), buns, tarts, pies, pasties, biscuits, cakes, confectionary, namely, slices, tarts, muffins, cookies and biscuits, sandwiches; food products made from flour, namely, cakes, scones, pies, puddings pasties, savory rolls; mixes and preparations for making bakery products, namely, flour | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Franchise services, namely, offering business management assistance with the operation and establishment of retail stores featuring food including bakery products, beverages, bread, bread products, pizza and pastry; retail and wholesale stores featuring food including bakery products, beverages, bread, bread products, pizza and pastry | ACTIVE | — |
| 043 | Retailing and wholesaling of food, beverages, bakery products, bread, bread products, pizza and pastry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 27, 2009 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 26, 2009 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2009 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |