USPTO serial 77081531
SNOWY OWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EISINGER, REBECCA MILES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SNOWY OWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mc Caysville, GA
Mc Caysville, GA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Security equipment in the nature of self-acting unified thought elements that, in combination, create cognitive controlled environment perimeter security for correctional and prison facilities, government and military buildings, utility companies, water and wastewater treatment plants, waterworks distribution networks, industrial plants and refineries, industrial/commercial properties, airports, marinas, auto dealerships, large residential homes, and manufacturing systems, namely, programming logic computers, computer hardware, system boards and processors, computer interface boards, ethernet cards and cables, computer networking hardware, computer chips, computer memories, computer memory hardware, microchips, microprocessors, computer network hubs, switches and routers, computer display monitors, computer terminals, and power supplies sold therewith; Ultra High Speed trigger systems comprising fiber-optic transmission systems, namely, fiber optic transmitters, receivers and transceivers used in the transmission of video, audio, and data signals over optical fiber; transmitting sets, namely, cable coupling transceivers and power supplies; monitoring apparatus, namely, microphones and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video cameras and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video object recognizers, comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video object trackers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video license plate readers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video face recognizers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video vehicle recognizers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video traffic detectors comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video access door controllers comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; monitoring apparatus, namely, video intrusion detectors comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith; processing computer hardware and software, and power supplies sold therewith, that analyze digital video images to automatically extract, record and report intelligence; monitoring apparatus, namely, remote video monitoring systems for security and surveillance applications, with manufacturing systems, comprising video cameras, microprocessors and power supplies sold therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 2, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |