USPTO serial 77081534
SKIN DEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKIN DEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandon Tesser
Brandon Tesser Tesser & Ruttenberg12100 Wilshire Blvd.Suite 220Los Angeles, CA 90025Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations; astringents for cosmetic purposes; bath oils for cosmetic purposes, bleaching preparations for cosmetic purposes; body and beauty care cosmetics; cosmetic cleansing creams; cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; concealers; cosmetic creams for skin care; cosmetic facial blotting papers; cosmetic oils; cosmetic pads; cosmetic pencils; cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; cosmetic preparations for body care; cosmetic preparations against sunburn; cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; cosmetic products in the form of aerosols for skin care; cosmetic rouges; cosmetic soaps; cosmetic suntan lotions or creams; facial creams; face creams for cosmetic uses; cosmetic facial creams; foams containing cosmetics and/or sunscreens; foundations; nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; pencils for cosmetic purposes; rose oil for cosmetic purposes; shampoos; toners; wrinkle removing skin care preparations; wrinkle reduction skin care preparations; age retardant lotion or creams; baby lotions or creams; body lotions or creams; beauty lotions or creams; eye lotions or creams; hand lotions or creams; face lotions or creams; creams or lotions for cellulite reduction; lotions for strengthening the nails; shaving lotions or creams, make-up removing lotions; make-up removing milk, gel, lotions and creams; non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin; skin cleansing lotions or creams; hair lotions or creams; styling lotions or creams; sun tan lotions or creams; sun care lotions or creams; sun block lotions or creams; toning lotions or creams (for the face, body and hands); teeth cleaning lotions, pastes or creams; Age retardant lotions or creams, anti-aging creams or lotions, body creams or lotions, cosmetic creams for skin care; essential oils for personal use; facial cleansers; facial creams; fragrances for personal use; hair care preparations; skin creams or lotions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |