USPTO serial 77082320
FASHION ICON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FASHION ICON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Montreal (St-Laurent), CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PATRICK A. PERLUZZO
PATRICK A. PERLUZZO MARTINO, PERLUZZO, ATTORNEYS1010 SHERBROOKE STREET WESTSUITE 2350MONTREAL, QC H3A2R7Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Men's, women's, boys', girls' and children's apparel, namely, shirts, pants, blazers, jackets, vests, skirts, shorts, jeans, sweaters, T-shirts, underclothing, undergarments, underwear, lingerie, panties, hosiery, camisoles, sleepwear, and footwear, and accessories thereof, namely, belts, socks, ties, caps and hats | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2009 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |