USPTO serial 77082431
TICKETAGENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2007
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TICKETAGENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roy S. Gordet
ROY S. GORDET LAW OFFICE OF ROY S. GORDET98 BATTERY ST STE 601SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-5529UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for marketing, namely computer software for creating and sending email marketing campaigns related to events, for tracking email communications with customers, for tracking how many on-line purchasers clicked through to purchase, for creating address mailing labels for marketing purposes, for doing consumer marketing surveys, and for creating customized promotional codes for coupons and offering special discounts with coupons; computer software for managing and controlling ticketing operations and related box office operations; computer software for providing marketing support relating to ticketing operations and related box office operations offered by entertainment venues and entertainment service companies; computer software for tracking ticket sales, maintaining ticket inventories, allocating seats, compiling data, and generating reports associated with ticket sales for ticketed events | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 17, 2002 |
| 042 | Application service provider services featuring software for managing and streamlining ticketing services, and related box office operations, for entertainment venues, entertainment service companies and organizations sponsoring ticketed events; application service provider services featuring software for marketing support services relating to ticketing operations and related box office operations, offered by entertainment venues, entertainment service companies and organizations sponsoring ticketed events; application service provider services featuring software for creating and sending email marketing campaigns, for tracking email communications with customers, for tracking how many on-line purchasers clicked through to purchase, for creating address mailing labels for marketing purposes, for doing consumer marketing surveys, and for creating customized promotional codes for coupons and offering special discounts with coupons | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 9, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |