Drawing for IN HARMONY WITH NATURE

USPTO serial 77082911

IN HARMONY WITH NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, ROBERT C
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IN HARMONY WITH NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steve Berreth

STEVE BERRETH ACCO BRANDS CORPORATION300 TOWER PKWYLINCOLNSHIRE, IL 60069-3640UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Drawing boards; directory boards; magnetic boards; pens; markers; chalks; crayons; children's project poster board; erasers; pastels; artists' materials, namely, water soluble tempura crayons, cakes of tempura paint, markers, plastic paint tray, and easel clips; architectural display board systems, namely, a combination white board and bulletin board unit and marker holder racks; message, dry wipe, chalk, bulletin and cork boards, desk top organizer; easelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2008MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 8, 2008ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 7, 2008EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance