USPTO serial 77083143
PRECISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRECISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD A. SOKOLSKI
EDWARD A. SOKOLSKI LAW OFFICE OF EDWARD A. SOKOLSKISTE 1053868 W CARSON STTORRANCE, CA 90503Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF REAL ESTATE | ACTIVE | Jan 2, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 26, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |