USPTO serial 77084117
HOLLYWOOD.TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LATTUCA, FRANK J
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HOLLYWOOD.TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Alumit
JOHN ALUMIT PATEL & ALUMIT, PC16830 VENTURA BLVD STE 360ENCINO, CA 91436-1711UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Continuing public service programs in the field of entertainment news produced and distributed over television, satellite, film, audio, video, internet, and 3-D virtual reality media; Distribution of television programming to cable television systems; Distribution of television programs for others; Entertainment in the nature of competitions in the field of talent search competition; Entertainment in the nature of on-going television programs in the field of entertainment news; Entertainment in the nature of television news shows; Entertainment in the nature of visual and audio performances, and musical, variety, news and comedy shows; Entertainment services namely live, televised and movie appearances by a professional entertainer; Entertainment Services namely providing a website featuring, photographic, audio, video and prose presentations featuring celebrities, movie trailers, movie show time listings, music and movie soundtracks, music videos, entertainment industry news, multimedia coverage of entertainment industry events provided over the internet and via cell phones; Entertainment services, namely, arranging and conducting of competitions for musical, movies and entertainment talents; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Entertainment services, namely, providing a television program in the field of entertainment news via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely, providing a web site featuring musical performances, musical videos, related film clips, photographs, and other multimedia materials; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line reviews of celebrities, movie trailers, movie show time listings, music and movie soundtracks, music videos, entertainment industry news, multimedia coverage of entertainment industry events; Entertainment services, namely, providing prerecorded music, information in the field of music, and commentary and articles about music, all on-line via a global computer network; Entertainment, namely a continuing news show broadcast over television, satellite, audio, and video media; Entertainment, namely, television news shows; Film distribution; News analysis and features distribution; Production and distribution of motion pictures; Production and distribution of television shows and movies; Production of cable television programs; Production of closed caption television programs; Providing news in the nature of current event reporting | ACTIVE | Jan 15, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 3, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |