USPTO serial 77084328
VITALTRAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SEVERSON, KAREN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VITALTRAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Charlotte, NC
Charlotte, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Seigel
Mark L. Seigel WEATHERLY, KERVEN & SEIGEL LLC115 PERIMETER CENTER PL NE STE 1082ATLANTA, GA 30346-1245UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software in the field of monitoring, tracking, and identifying the geographic location and position of children, persons, pets, vehicles, and property | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Monitoring, tracking and identifying the geographic location and position of employees, persons, vehicles and property for commercial purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring, tracking and identifying the geographic location and position of children, persons, pets, vehicles and personal property for personal purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VitalTrax LLC
- Other trademarks owned by VitalTrax LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named VITALTRAX
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 6, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |