USPTO serial 77084879
HR HRVALUE GROUP HUMAN RESOURCES WITH A CREDIT UNION FOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HR HRVALUE GROUP HUMAN RESOURCES WITH A CREDIT UNION FOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Edward Dolgorukov
D. EDWARD DOLGORUKOV MARSHALL & MELHORNFOUR SEAGATEEIGHTH FLOORTOLEDO, OH 43604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Conulting services in the field of human resources, namely organizational development; executive searches; salary and compensation management; strategic planning facilitation; recruiting; custom training, namely employee training and board of director responsibility training; other human resources related services, all with a credit union focus | ACTIVE | Jan 17, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |