Drawing for THE GULP OF MEXICO

USPTO serial 77084985

THE GULP OF MEXICO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KAJUBI, ELIZABETH N
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE GULP OF MEXICO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Randall B. Bateman

RANDALL B. BATEMAN BATEMAN IP LAW GROUPPO BOX 1319SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84110-1319UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Non-alcoholic fruit, vegetable, rice and flower based beverages, beverage concentrates and beverage mixes, namely, horchata, tamarind, hibiscus, watermelon and melonABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2007MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 12, 2007ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 18, 2007EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 23, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 20, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 9, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 9, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 25, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 22, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance