USPTO serial 77086038
LONDON NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4373981Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2013
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LONDON NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
British Columbia, CA
British Columbia, CA
British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Uhlir
JAMES R. UHLIR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS PLLC1201 Third Avenue, Suite 3600SEATTLE, WA 98101-3029UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Shampoo; hair conditioner; body cream, namely, vitamin E cream; baby care products, namely, baby oil, baby shampoo, baby powder, baby lotion, baby wipes; creams and lotions, namely, collagen elastin cream, cold cream, cocoa butter, aloe vera cream, hand cream; household cleaning products, namely, dishwashing liquid detergent, dishwasher detergent, window cleaning liquid, all purpose liquid cleaner, disinfectant liquid cleaner, all purpose spray cleaner; household ammonia; laundry cleaning products, namely, fabric softener, bleach, stain remover; make-up removal pads; cotton facial pads; cotton swabs; absorbent cotton balls; cosmetic accessories, namely, sponge tip eye shadow brushes, cosmetic sponges and facial puffs; powder puffs; cosmetic brushes; non-medicated sunburn relief gel; sunless tanning lotion; men's and women's deodorants; non-medicated facial tissues; non-medicated petroleum jelly; bath oil; liquid soap | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2020 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 30, 2018 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 14, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 10, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 5, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 5, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 17, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |