USPTO serial 77086491
PATSY'S PIZZERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 760
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELZER, LYDIA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATSY'S PIZZERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN ROFFE
BRIAN ROFFE LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN ROFFE10034 DIAMOND LAKE DRIVEBOYNTON BEACH, FL 33437-5531UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Franchising, namely, offering technical assistance in the establishment and/or operation of pizzerias | PARTIALLY PAID | Dec 31, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 21, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 5, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2018 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2013 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 11, 2012 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 13, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 11, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 19, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RTTP | RESTORE TO TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 15, 2007 | RFTP | REMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS | — |
| May 8, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |