Drawing for VOIP NETWORKS POWERING YOUR COMPANY'S VOICE

USPTO serial 77086514

VOIP NETWORKS POWERING YOUR COMPANY'S VOICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VOIP NETWORKS POWERING YOUR COMPANY'S VOICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John J. O'Malley

John J. O'Malley Volpe and Koenig, P.C.30 S. 17th Street, Suite 1600Philadelphia, PA 19103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Voice over Internet protocol (VOIP) servicesACTIVEJan 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2010MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 6, 2010ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 6, 2010EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 25, 2009GNS1NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 25, 2009GNSFSUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED—
Mar 25, 2009CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN—
Mar 4, 2009TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2009TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 3, 2008GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2008CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 19, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 12, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 12, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 12, 2008GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 12, 2008GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 12, 2008CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 22, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 24, 2007MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Jan 23, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance