USPTO serial 77088246
UPPER HAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UPPER HAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L Tingey
DAVID L TINGEY LAW OFFICE OF DAVID L TINGEY15 S GRADY WAY STE 336RENTON, WA 98057-3215UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Manually operated tools, for lawn and garden use, namely, clamps, lawn rakes, lawn aerators, pruners, saws, loppers, spray can holder, shears, water spray guns, light bulb changer; extensions for hand tools; extension poles for hand tools; extension poles of adjustable length for hand tools; manually-operated extension poles with a manually-operated mechanism on a proximal handle end for remotely operating or actuating a device attached on a pole distal end for hand tools; hand-operated pruning shears; hand operated saws for lawn and garden use; hand tools, namely, pruners; saws for cutting branches; hand tools, namely, loppers; manually operated reaching tools for changing light bulbs, window washing, cleaning gutters, holding spray cans, dusting, and holding water spray guns | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Lawn and garden hand tools, namely, squeegees with spray nozzles for washing windows, swiveling nozzles for use with a garden hose to clean gutters, and dusters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 18, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | AMPB | AMENDMENT/PETITION AFTER APPROVAL FOR PUB ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |