USPTO serial 77088437
Serial No. 77088437
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 77088437?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Rancho Dominguez, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP
SUSAN NATLAND KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON, & BEAR, LLP14TH FLOOR 2040 MAIN STREETIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Attaché cases, garment bags for travel, beach bags, messenger bags, briefcases, canes, all-purpose sport bags, duffel bags, backpacks, handbags, key cases, wallets, purses, tote bags, athletic bags, book bags, gym bags, overnight bags, fanny packs, rucksacks, cosmetic bags sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, credit card cases, calling card cases, suitcases, traveling bags, trunks for traveling, umbrellas, valises, and shopping bags of textile, leather and mesh | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, tops, tank tops, jerseys, T-shirts, blouses, sweat shirts, sweaters, ponchos, shawls, scarves, dresses, skirts, bottoms, shorts, overalls, jeans, pants, sweat pants, coats, jackets, rainwear, belts, socks, swimwear, robes, gloves, mittens, sleepwear and undergarments; headwear and footwear | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 13, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |