Drawing for AGELESS

USPTO serial 77088457

AGELESS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HETU, JENNIFER
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGELESS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Victor N. King

VICTOR N. KING SPECKMAN LAW GROUP PLLC1201 3RD AVE STE 330SEATTLE, WA 98101-3000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010MEDICAL GOODS, NAMELY, MEDICAL ICE PACKS, SURGICAL SHOE COVERS, AND PROTECTIVE BOOTS FOR USE AFTER SURGICAL PROCEDURESACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, ROBES; FOOTWEARACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 23, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 23, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 7, 2008EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 6, 2008GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2008GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jul 6, 2008CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 6, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 5, 2008ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 2008EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 5, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 5, 2008EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 5, 2007GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 5, 2007GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2007CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 14, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 25, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance