USPTO serial 77088926
EXPERTTRAINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3371006Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 15, 2008
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXPERTTRAINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CULVER CITY, CA
PANAMA CITY, FL
Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
Panama City, FL
Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
Panama City, FL
Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. McCue
Michael J. McCue Lewis Roca Rothgeber LLP3993 Howard Hughes ParkwaySte. 600Las Vegas, NV 89169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Training services in the field of information technology, software and hardware systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by NANTHEALTH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ISIRONA, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Healthcare Technology Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EXPERTTRAINING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 24, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 15, 2008 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 27, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |