USPTO serial 77088929
BUDDHA DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4565852Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2014
- Examiner
- GLASSER, CARYN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BUDDHA DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles L. Gagnebin III
CHARLES L. GAGNEBIN III Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios LLPTen Post Office SquareBoston, MA 02109UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Wearing apparel, namely, t-shirts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Hot dogs, namely, frankfurters; Sauces and condiments, namely, fruit spreads, vegetable-based spreads, red pepper jelly, processed sweet onion, butter, garlic oil, beef chili, habanero oil, spicy jerky, apple butter, lime chili mango fruit topping, raspberry chipotle fruit topping, chipotle pepper sauce, golden habanero jelly, jalapeno tequila jelly, blueberry jelly, smooth guacamole, sun-dried tomato tapenade, olive tapenade, lime cilantro oil, shallot marmalade, green blueberry julep jelly, asparagus pear vegetable-based spread, spicy peanut spread, chocolate butter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Sauces and condiments, namely, apple barbeque sauce, honey mustard, champagne cassis dijon mustard, tomato relish, yellow tomato relish, rosemary chicken gravy, pumpkin pie, processed herbs, honey cherry ketchup, corn relish, maple brandy ginger peach relish, maple dijon mustard, mustard, tomato pear chutney, tomato peach chutney, peach mango wasabi, maple syrup, ketchup, basil pesto, ginger maple dijon mustard, tomato basil balsamic vinegar | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 043 | Dine-in and take-out restaurant services serving food and drinks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buddha Foodha Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Buddha Foodha Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Buddha Foodha Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 043
- Similar marks named BUDDHA DOG
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 13, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |