USPTO serial 77089215
RIVER STONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RIVER STONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John J. O'Malley
JOHN J. O'MALLEY VOLPE AND KOENIG, P.C.30 S 17TH ST STE 1600PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-4009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Luggage, excluding women's hand bags and purses; luggage, namely, luggage that stands up straight, duffel bags, tote bags, backpacks; luggage accessories, namely, luggage straps and tags; luggage accessories, namely, metal and non-metal locks sold as integral component parts of luggage; luggage, namely, satchels, briefcases, backpacks, travel bags and travel cases, wallets, business card cases, calling card cases, credit card cases, cosmetic cases sold empty; luggage accessories, namely, leather key cases with holders therein for keeping keys in place | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 21, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 22, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |