USPTO serial 77089305
NAVITRACKRF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NAVITRACKRF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. Hoffman and Stephanie A. Gumm
John F. Hoffman and Stephanie A. Gumm Baker & Daniels LLPSuite 800111 East Wayne StreetFort Wayne, IN 46802Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in image guided surgery | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Surgical and medical instruments and apparatus, namely pointers, drills, saws, rasps, guide blocks, laparoscopes, trocars and universal handles; electro-medical apparatus, namely computers and display devices, calibration devices, tracker and reference markers, fluoroscopes and X-ray generators for the positioning of, for the determination of the position of and for the three-dimensional representation of implants and mounting elements, namely internal fixations, virtual screws and screwdrivers and structural parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 18, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 25, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |