Drawing for LARIMAR

USPTO serial 77089310

LARIMAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARIMAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sandra Epp Ryan

Sandra Epp Ryan Faegre & Benson LLP90 South Seventh Street2200 Wells Fargo CenterMinneapolis, MN 55402

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics and toilet preparations for body care, body soaps, hair care preparations, non-medicated skin care preparations, colognes and perfumes, after shave lotion, bath oil, mouthwash, toothpaste and deodorantsACTIVE—
035Retail gift shop services featuring cosmetics and toilet preparations, flowers and other giftsACTIVE—
044Health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care services; Health spa services featuring massages, facials, body treatments, manicures, pedicures, nail care, hair styling; Health spa services for health and wellness of the body and spirit offered at a health resort.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 23, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 15, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 20, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 20, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 22, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 22, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 12, 2009DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 6, 2009EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 6, 2009AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 16, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 16, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 16, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 18, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 22, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 22, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 10, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 29, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 24, 2007GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2007CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
May 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance