CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for STEPHEN NG FINANCIAL GROUP

USPTO serial 77089378

STEPHEN NG FINANCIAL GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STEPHEN NG FINANCIAL GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Drew Kastner

W. DREW KASTNER MOSES & SINGER LLPTHE CHRYSLER BLDG405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-1299

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business advertising and marketing services; business management, administration, analysis, research, forecasting and consultation services; direct mail advertising; distribution of direct mail advertising for othersACTIVE—
040Printing and typesetting servicesACTIVE—
041Educational and training services, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, and workshops in the field of financial services counseling and the distribution of course materials in connection therewith; publication of direct mail materials for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 5, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 13, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 8, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2008XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 18, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 18, 2008GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 18, 2008CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 21, 2007GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 21, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Nov 21, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 31, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 26, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance