USPTO serial 77089416
LIMÓN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WIENER, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIMÓN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Joy Kattwinkel
LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2448UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | HOUSE MARK FOR PACKAGED, PRESERVED, FROZEN, BOTTLED AND CANNED FOODS, NAMELY, APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POULTRY, FISH, SHELLFISH, FRUITS, VEGETABLES AND CHEESES; HORS D' OEUVRES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POULTRY, FISH, SHELLFISH, FRUITS, VEGETABLES AND CHEESES; ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POULTRY, FISH, SHELLFISH, FRUITS, VEGETABLES AND CHEESES; SIDE DISHES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POULTRY, FISH, SHELLFISH, FRUITS, VEGETABLES AND CHEESES; SAUCES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEATS, POULTRY, FISH, SHELLFISH, CRANBERRIES, APPLES, AND VEGETABLES; CONDIMENTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF TAPENADES, PEPPER OILS AND MUSTARDS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | HOUSE MARK FOR PACKAGED, PRESERVED, FROZEN, BOTTLED AND CANNED FOODS, NAMELY, APPETIZERS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BREAD PRODUCTS, STUFFING, PASTRIES, PASTA, RICE, DOUGHS AND SPICES; HORS D' OEUVRES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BREAD PRODUCTS, STUFFING, PASTRIES, PASTA, RICE, DOUGHS AND SPICES; ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BREAD PRODUCTS, STUFFING, PASTRIES, PASTA, RICE, DOUGHS AND SPICES; SIDE DISHES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF BREAD PRODUCTS, STUFFING, PASTRIES, PASTA, RICE, DOUGHS AND SPICES; SAUCES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CHEESES, FRUITS EXCLUDING CRANBERRIES AND APPLESAUCE, AND SPICES; CONDIMENTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF SPICES, RELISHES AND KETCHUPS; AND DESSERTS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTRIES, DOUGHS AND SPICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 29, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |