USPTO serial 77089508
VISMAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- MAYES, LAURIE ANN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with VISMAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Playa Del Rey, CA
Playa Del Rey, CA
Playa Del Rey, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shawls and stoles | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Shivani Shawls Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shivani Shawls Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Shivani Shawls Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by VISMAYA INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named VISMAYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 29, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 29, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 18, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 20, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 20, 2014 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2014 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | ERTI | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION INQUIRY LETTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | TPDR | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 21, 2012 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Dec 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2007 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 27, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |