Drawing for BUDA FUSION

USPTO serial 77089596

BUDA FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BUDA FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey M. Furr

Jeffrey M. Furr ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurants; cateringABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2008MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 8, 2008ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 8, 2008OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
May 8, 2008OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Mar 27, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2008ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 5, 2008TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 30, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 11, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 26, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 24, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 6, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 6, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance