USPTO serial 77089716
CAFÉTAMALLI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, ELLEN J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAFÉTAMALLI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DelegacioBenito-Juarez, MX
DelegacioBenito-Juarez, MX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs, milk and milk products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; edible oils and fats; salads except macaroni, rice and pasta salad; guacamole; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; milk drinks containing fruits; fillings for tamales, namely, chicken, beef, pork, cheese and vegetable fillings; gelatin, namely, unflavored and unsweetened gelatin | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Tamales; salsas; chips, namely, corn, tortilla and taco chips; esquites, namely, traditional Mexican corn snacks; dried corn husks for tamales; fillings for tamales namely, sweet yellow corn and chocolate fillings; food items, namely, fruit flavored food flavorings for milk made with cereal and vitamins; hot chocolate and hot chocolate mixes, coffee and powdered coffee mixes, spices, bakery desserts, puddings, custard, arroz con leche, rice pudding, vanilla pudding and flan; gelatin, namely, flavored and sweetened gelatin; frozen, prepared and packaged entrees and meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; espresso, coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour, bread, pastry and confectionery, namely, sweet tamales and pastries; flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; ice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Horchata; powdered preparations for making corn or rice based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Promecasa, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Promecasa, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named CAFÉTAMALLI
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 11, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 19, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |