USPTO serial 77089966
BASLAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4107152Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 6, 2012
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BASLAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce M. Ferraro
Joyce M. Ferraro Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Automotive and industrial body repair putties | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 002 | Paints; lacquers; surfacers, namely, undercoating for surfaces to be painted and paint used to repair vehicles prior to application of color finishes; primers, namely, automotive paint primer, coatings in the nature of automotive primer and primer for preparing surfaces to be painted; preparations against rust, namely, rust preventatives in the nature of a coating and rust preservatives in the nature of a coating; paint hardener, namely, varnishes; thinners for paints, namely, paint thinner; clear coatings used in the nature of automotive refinishing paints | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BASF COATINGS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by BASF COATINGS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by BASF Coatings AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Similar marks named BASLAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED | — |
| Mar 6, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | 44EG | 44(e) PETITION - GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2011 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2011 | TPAD | TEAS PETITION TO AMEND BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2010 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 20, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 12, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 22, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 21, 2008 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 19, 2007 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |