USPTO serial 77089969
NEW ZEALAND SKINFOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NEW ZEALAND SKINFOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colin P. Abrahams
COLIN P. ABRAHAMS LAW OFFICE OF COLIN P. ABRAHAMS5850 CANOGA AVE STE 400WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367-6554UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; beauty and toiletry preparations, namely, oils for toiletry purposes, beauty serums; toilet soaps; pumice soap, namely, granulated soap containing pumice stone; pumice stones for personal use; non-medicated bath salts; bath and shower gels; body lotions; salt scrubs, namely, body scrubs containing salt, facial scrubs containing salt; perfumery; essential oils, namely, skin, hand, face) creams; bar, bath and perfumed soaps; lotions, skin, hand and face lotions; moisturizers, namely, skin and body moisturizers; refresher spray, namely, scented fabric refresher spray, body spray in atomized containers used to produce a cooling effect; showering reparations, namely, shower gels and shower creams; skin lightening preparations, namely, skin lighteners and skin lightening creams; potpourri; fragrances for personal use; cleansing creams; hand creams; make-up removers; skin creams, namely, non- medicated skin tightening cream and impurity removing skin cream; nail care products, namely, nail care products, nail cream, nail strengtheners; hair lotions, shampoos and conditioners; dentifrices; preparations for teeth, namely, teeth cleaning lotions, toothpaste, mouthwashes and non-medicated mouth rinses, teeth whitening preparations and teeth polishing preparations, namely, tooth polish; anti-perspirants; deodorants for personal use; body sprays talcs, namely, talcum powders; face powders; shaving foams; aftershaves; sunscreen preparations, namely, sunscreen cream | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 20, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |