USPTO serial 77090015
CLEAR CHOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLEAR CHOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Aloe vera gel for cosmetic purposes; Astringents for cosmetic purposes; Bath oils for cosmetic purposes; Beauty creams; Beauty creams for body care; Beauty gels; Beauty lotions; Beauty masks; Beauty milks; Beauty serums; Body and beauty care cosmetics; Body and beauty care preparations; Chalk for cosmetic use; Chalk for make-up; Cleaner for cosmetic brushes; Cleansing creams; Cocoa butter for cosmetic purposes; Coloring preparations for cosmetic purposes; Compacts containing make-up; Concealers; Cosmetic balls; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic creams for skin care; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic milks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic oils for the epidermis; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetic preparations against sunburn; Cosmetic preparations for body care; Cosmetic preparations for eye lashes; Cosmetic preparations for skin renewal; Cosmetic preparations for the care of mouth and teeth; Cosmetic rouges; Cosmetic soaps; Cosmetic sun-protecting preparations; Cosmetic sun-tanning preparations; Cosmetic suntan lotions; Cosmetics; Cotton balls for cosmetic purposes; Cotton buds for cosmetic purposes; Cotton for cosmetic purposes; Cotton puffs for cosmetic purposes; Cotton sticks for cosmetic purposes; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Decorative transfers and skin jewels for cosmetic purposes; Eye make-up; Eye make-up remover; Eyes make-up; Face and body beauty creams; Face creams for cosmetic use; Facial beauty masks; Facial make-up; Foams containing cosmetics and sunscreens; Foundation; Foundation make-up; Gauze for cosmetic purposes; Greases for cosmetic purposes; Make up foundations; Make up removing preparations; Make-up; Make-up foundations; Make-up pencils; Make-up powder; Make-up products for the face and body; Non-medicated acne treatment preparations; Nutritional oils for cosmetic purposes; Paraffin wax for cosmetic purposes; Pencils for cosmetic purposes; Perfume oils for the manufacture of cosmetic preparations; Petroleum jelly for cosmetic purposes; Pre-moistened cosmetic tissues; Pre-moistened cosmetic towelettes; Pre-moistened cosmetic wipes; Shampoos; Soaps; Toners; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes; Washing-up liquids | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2005 |
| 005 | Acne medications; Acne treatment preparations | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 15, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |