USPTO serial 77090181
WWW.FOODONACLICK.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WWW.FOODONACLICK.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Carlos Eduardo Peraza Hernandez
Davie, FL
Carlos Eduardo Peraza Hernandez
Davie, FL
Coconut Grove, FL
Coconut Grove, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line ordering services featuring restaurant food service; connects restaurant with customers, customers with restaurants, restaurants with suppliers and viceversa; Through a blinking light and a sound the restaurants will know when orders are received; Through an e-mail confirmation restaurant customers will know that the order was taken | ACTIVE | Jan 24, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Carlos Eduardo Peraza Hernandez
- Other trademarks owned by Carlos Eduardo Peraza Hernandez
- Other trademarks owned by Mariluz Register
- Other trademarks owned by Mariluz Register
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named WWW.FOODONACLICK.COM
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |