USPTO serial 77090226
RES-Q
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MITTLER, ROBIN M
- Law office
- OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RES-Q?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark R. Galis
MARK R. GALIS GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP77 W. WACKER DRIVESUITE 2500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1732Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and bath and beauty products, namely lipstick, hand soap, hair shampoo, perfume, eau de toilette, eau de parfum, bath gel, moisturizing lotion, talc, body cream, eye cream, blush, hair spray, lip gloss, eye shadow, mascara, face make-up, nail polish, nail enamel, eye make-up, body lotion, skin lightener, make-up remover and body spray | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2008 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 2008 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 15, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |