USPTO serial 77090955
LAKEWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARKER, JUSTINE D
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAKEWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Beth H. Alter
BETH H. ALTER SEWARD & KISSEL LLP1 BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1405UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, except those provided by traditional consumer banking institutions, namely, investment management and advisory services in the field of hedge funds | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Lakewood Capital Management, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LAKEWOOD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP
- Other trademarks owned by LAKEWOOD CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (GP), LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named LAKEWOOD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2008 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |