Drawing for INTELLIGENT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 77091209

INTELLIGENT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3273010Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 31, 2007
Examiner
AQUILA, STEPHEN DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLIGENT VEHICLE TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Harold J Fassnacht

Luis A. Perez281 West Valleybrook RoadCalifon, NJ 07830UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Automobile safety and security telematic systems, namely automobile severe braking and emergency warning systems, comprised primarily of in-vehicle computer software and hardware, for the purpose of providing visual and/or aural severe braking warning signals to drivers of surrounding vehicles and providing visual and/or aural signals to the vehicle driver to warn the driver of various upcoming road hazardsEXPIREDMay 17, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9โ€”
Jul 31, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILEDโ€”
Feb 20, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILEDโ€”
Feb 19, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Feb 19, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGALโ€”
Feb 1, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 1, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
Feb 1, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 8, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDโ€”
May 29, 2008NOSUNOTICE OF SUITโ€”
Jul 31, 2007R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 25, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Jun 21, 2007CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERโ€”
Jun 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jun 12, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jun 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
May 25, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 15, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance