Drawing for BILAXTEN

USPTO serial 77091224

BILAXTEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BILAXTEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Lebow

Mark Lebow YOUNG & THOMPSONSuite 500209 Madison StreetAlexandria, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005AntihistaminesACTIVEJun 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 9, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 6, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 22, 2010CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2010SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 4, 2010EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Oct 2, 2010IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 8, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 7, 2010PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2010PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 5, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 1, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 1, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 4, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 2, 2009EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 3, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 18, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 18, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 2, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 2, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 2, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 1, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 1, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 14, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 14, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance