Drawing for CULINARY ARTISAN FOOD EXPERIENCE

USPTO serial 77091263

CULINARY ARTISAN FOOD EXPERIENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEM-HOWEY, AISHA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CULINARY ARTISAN FOOD EXPERIENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elizabeth R. Gosse,

Laurie H. van Loben Sels Duane Morris LLPOne Market Plaza, Suite 2200San Francisco, CA 94105-1127UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Olive oil; salad oil; dipping oil; flavored dipping oil; pickled vegetables; pickles; gift packs consisting primarily of selected edible oils; tapenadesACTIVE—
030Salad dressings, vinegar, flavored vinegar; condiments, namely, mustard, flavored mustard, relish, pickle relish, salsa, picante sauce, hot sauce, savory sauces, marinades, glazes, mayonnaise; dry mixes for baked goods; dessert sauces; processed herbs; spices; processed herb and spice blends; and gift packs consisting primarily of selected vinegars, dry mixes for baked goods, glazes and marinades, processed herb and spice blends, and also including fruit saucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 14, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 18, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 20, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 19, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 19, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 12, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 6, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2007GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 30, 2007CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 20, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 29, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance