USPTO serial 77091365
INTELLIGENT SURGICAL DEVICES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SALEMI, DOMINICK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTELLIGENT SURGICAL DEVICES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW HAVEN, CT
NEW HAVEN, CT
Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
West Langhorne, PA
Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
West Langhorne, PA
Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
West Langhorne, PA
POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
MANSFIELD, MA
POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
MANSFIELD, MA
POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
MANSFIELD, MA
POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
MANSFIELD, MA
Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
West Langhorne, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Farber
Mark Farber Covidien555 Long Wharf DriveNew Haven, CT 06511UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical cutting devices; Medical device and surgical instrument for use in diagnosis and surgery of the gastro-intestinal tract; Medical devices, namely, surgical devices that facilitate the identification, separation or ablation of biologic tissues; Medical instruments for cutting tissue; Medical instruments for use in general surgery, endoscopic surgery, gynecological surgery, in and around the gastroinstestinal tract, cardiothoracic surgery, bariatric surgery, colorectal surgery, cardiovascular surgery, natural orifice surgery, natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery; Rigid and flexible medical endoscopes; Surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; Surgical instruments for use in general surgery, thoracic surgery, bariatric surgery, colorectal surgery, cardiovascular surgery, natural orifice surgery, natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, in and around the gastrointestinal tract, the closure of internal incisions and wounds, endoscopic surgery, gynecological surgery, creation of anastomoses, transection and resection of tissues, open occlusion of the hearts left atrial appendage, closure of internal incisions,; Surgical instruments, namely, staplers, endoscopic staplers, natural orifice staplers, linear cutters, circular staplers, energy delivery devices, optical instruments, microrobotic instruments, linear cutters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP
- Other trademarks owned by TYCO HEALTHCARE GROUP LP
- Other trademarks owned by Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by POWER MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Power Medical Interventions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named INTELLIGENT SURGICAL DEVICES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 15, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 26, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 21, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |