USPTO serial 77091684
TRIPQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 24, 2011
- Examiner
- BROWN, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with TRIPQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAMUEL M. HIRSH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
FALMOUTH, ME
Other trademarks owned by SAMUEL M. HIRSH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
Falmouth, IL
Chicago, IL
Falmouth, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eric S. Freibrun
Eric S. Freibrun FREIBRUN LAW1954 FIRST STREET, NO. 170HIGHLAND PARK, IL 60035UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | [Bag closures of metal; Belts of metal for handling loads; Beverage cans of metal; Bicycle locks; Bottle closures of metal; Buckles of common metal; Cans of metal; Containers of metal for transport; Fasteners, namely, metal bars and chains; Flexible metal foils packaging materials for use in the manufacture of pouches, bags and lids; General purpose metal storage bins; General purpose metal storage containers; Letter boxes of metal; Metal beverage cans; Metal bicycle locks; Metal binding strips used on packaging; Metal bins; Metal boxes; Metal cans, sold empty; Metal caps for bottles; Metal cash boxes; Metal cash deposit boxes; Metal chains; Metal closures for containers; Metal closures for bottles, containers and bags; Metal coin banks; Metal containers for the storage and transportation of goods; Metal identification bracelets; Metal key chains; Metal key fobs; Metal key holders; Metal key rings; Metal keys for locks; Metal letter boxes; Metal lids; Metal lids for cans; Metal lock boxes; Metal locking mechanisms; Metal locks; Metal locks and keys therefor; Metal lock sets; Metal money boxes; Metal padlocks; Metal safes; Metal security lock cylinders; Metal strong boxes; Metal tent pegs; Metal tent stakes; Metal threaded fasteners; Metal train and bus ticket holders; Money boxes of metal; Rings of metal for keys; Small items of metal hardware, namely, high security locks and sheet metal plates primarily for the casino and gaming industry; Snowboard locks of metal] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2006 |
| 018 | [Bags and holdalls for sports clothing; Belt bags; Coin purses not made of precious metal; Coin purses, not of precious metals; Cushion padding made for saddlery; Key bags; Key case; Key cases; Key wallets; Key-cases of leather and skins; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather cases for keys; Leather key cases; Leather key chains; Metal parts of umbrellas; Pads for horse saddles; Purses; Purses and wallets of precious metal; Saddle belts; Shopping bags with wheels attached; Umbrellas and their parts; Wallets; Wallets with card compartments; Wine bags with handles for carrying or holding wine] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2006 |
| 025 | [Belts; Belts made of leather; Belts of textile; Caps with visors; Coats for men and women; Combinations; Embossed soles and heels of rubber or of plastic materials; Fabric belts; Footwear for men and women; Footwear for track and field athletics; Fur coats and jackets; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Infants' shoes and boots; Insoles; Leather belts; Men and women jackets, coats, trousers, vests;] Money belts; Panties, shorts and briefs; [Protective metal members for shoes and boots; Shawls and headscarves; Shawls and stoles; Shoulder pads for clothing; Ski and snowboard shoes and parts thereof; Skirts and dresses; Socks and stockings; [Sports jerseys and breeches for sports; Sports shirts with short sleeves; Suspender belts for men; Suspender belts for women; Swim wear for gentlemen and ladies; Toboggan hats, pants and caps; Tongue or pullstrap for shoes and boots; Track and field shoes; Waist belts;] Waterproof jackets and pants; Wet suits for water-skiing and sub-aqua; Work shoes and boots] | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2006 |
| 035 | Retail store services[, available through computer communications and interactive television, ]featuring luggage and luggage accessories, sporting goods, camping gear, [fishing equipment and related gear and apparel, watercraft,] travel accessories, security items for personal belongs, hiking and related equipment[; catalog ordering services, electronic catalog services and mail order catalog services featuring luggage and luggage accessories, sporting goods, camping gear, fishing equipment and related gear and apparel, watercraft,] travel accessories, security items for [personal belongs,] hiking and related equipment | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMUEL M. HIRSH AND ASSOCIATES, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsh, Samuel
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsh, Samuel
- Other trademarks owned by Hirsh, Samuel
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named TRIPQUIPMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 11, 2023 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2020 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 29, 2020 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 26, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 5, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 25, 2016 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 25, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 24, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2016 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2016 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 16, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 27, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2010 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2010 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 27, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2009 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 4, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |