USPTO serial 77091737
GLOSS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOSS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lesley A Moradian
LESLEY A MORADIAN THE ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES767 5TH AVE FL 42NEW YORK, NY 10153-0003UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfumery, namely, after shave balms, After shave lotions and after shave gels; cologne, eau de parfum, eau de toilette, essential oils for personal use and perfume; Toiletries, namely, fragranced body lotions, body creams, body powders, body sprays; Toiletries, namely, bath crystals, bath oils, bath powders, bath salts, body moisturizing cream, skin cleansers, facial cleansers, body creams, skin exfoliants for use on the body exfoliating, body lotions, shower gels, bath gel, facial wash, body powders, body scrubs, body toners, body oils, hair anti-frizzing preparations, hair conditioners, hair elixirs, hair gloss, hair mascara, hair mousses, hair nourishers, hair shampoos, hair sprays, hair straightening preparations, hair styling creams, hair styling gels, hair styling wax, sunscreens preparations for the hair, hair thickening preparations, hair tonics, hand creams, personal soaps, salt scrubs for the skin; shimmering beauty gels, lotions and creams for body; Cosmetics; Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, anti-perspirant/deodorants, anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels, skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing gels, pre-moistened cosmetic cleansing wipes, eye creams, eye gels, eye makeup removers, face creams, beauty gels for the face, face lotions, face masks, facial emulsions, facial exfoliating preparations, facial makeup removers, facial moisturizers, facial mousse, non-medicated skin care preparation, namely, tonic and lotion for controlling facial skin oil, facial soaps, facial toners, personal soaps, salt scrubs for the skin, shaving foams, creams, lotions and gels, skin balancing lotion, non-medicated skin care preparations for preventing blemishes, skin bronzing creams, lotions and gels, cosmetic preparations for brightening the skin, skin conditioners, skin firming preparations, namely, cream, lotion and gel; skin lighteners, non-medicated stimulating lotions for the skin, skin moisture renewal creams, lotions and gels; skin repair creams, lotions and gels, sunblock preparations, sunless tanning preparations, sunscreens preparations for the body and face and after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations, tinted moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 9, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 11, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 24, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |