USPTO serial 77091867
SCD EFFECTIVE MICROORGANISMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SETTLES LEWIS, SHAILA E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCD EFFECTIVE MICROORGANISMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Wingate, Registration No. 43,776
KIMBERLY A. WINGATE, REGISTRATION NO. 43,776 LATHROP & GAGE L.C.10851 MASTIN BOULEVARDBUILDING 82, SUITE 1000OVERLAND PARK, KS 66210-1669Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Substances for gardening, regulating plant growth, controlling plant disease and improving plant health, namely, bacteria in the nature of probiotic cultures; substances for waste management, recycling and composting, odor control and bio remediation, namely, bacteria in the nature of probiotic cultures; substances for industrial cleaning and sanitation, namely, bacteria in the nature of probiotic cultures | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Food supplements containing probiotic cultures used for human health; probiotic formulations used for animal health, namely, animal feed supplements containing probiotic cultures; substances for improving human health, particularly substances for dental hygiene and for controlling periodontal disease, namely, dental rinses containing probiotic cultures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2008 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Aug 1, 2008 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 16, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 31, 2007 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |