USPTO serial 77092111
MONSTER MUSCLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MONSTER MUSCLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bennet Langlotz
BENNET LANGLOTZ LANGLOTZ PATENT WORKS, INC.P.O. BOX 759GENOA, NV 89411-0759UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; Topical gel for medical and therapeutic treatment of muscle and joint soreness | ABANDONED | Aug 30, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |