Drawing for SECUREDOC SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 77092163

SECUREDOC SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SECUREDOC SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy J. Benjamin, Robert J. Sacco, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Eric A. Prager, Karin Segall, Laura J. Winston and Abigail Rubinstein

Abigail Rubinstein Darby & Darby PC7 World Trade Center250 Greenwich StreetNew York, NY 10007-0042

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042conversion of data or documents from paper form to electronic mediaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 30, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 30, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 30, 2009OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2008OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 9, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 9, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 30, 2007ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 29, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 28, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 31, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 31, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 13, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 16, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2007MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Jan 30, 2007NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance