USPTO serial 77092471
PHITEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 2014
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, RONALD G
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with PHITEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newmarket, NZ
Newmarket, NZ
BEVERLY, MA
Auckland, NZ
Auckland 1023, NZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter S. Weissman
Peter S. Weissman BLANK ROME LLP1825 Eye Street NWWashington, DC 20006United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for measuring and checking sound waves, sound and audio signals, namely, digital signal processors, sound and/or audio equalizers, analyzers and processors, surround sound systems, sound level meters, sound mixers, electronic frequency converters for sound velocity, sound and/or audio amplifiers, cables and fibers to check sound and/or audio; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, jacks, plugs, connectors and electrical conduits; apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, namely, headphones, headsets, microphones, loudspeakers, audio earpieces, stereo sound reproducers, multimedia equipment, namely, in-flight entertainment systems comprising media servers, AM/FM radio, satellite radio, CD, MP3 and DVD players, intercoms, LCD displays, seat distribution units, audio and video transmitters, receivers and connectors, and peripherals, audio spacialisation, and signal processing equipment, portable music players and telephones and mobile telephones; software used for the instrumentation of signaling, checking, and manipulations of sound waves, sound, image and audio signals; data processors; computers; sound equipment, namely, amplifiers, graphic equalizers and sound cards for computers; software for signal processing equipment; software for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images including software for active noise cancellation, active noise reduction and sound masking for use in the production and reproduction of music, home and portable audio reproduction and scientific and industrial audio production and reproduction | ACTIVE | Nov 21, 2012 |
| 035 | Wholesale distributorship services, retail store services and online retail store services featuring apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, headphones, sound equipment, software relating to recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, and noise cancellation technology products including parts, fittings and accessories; business advisory, consultancy and management services relating to the foregoing; product demonstration services; business merchandising display services; all of the foregoing also available online and via the internet | ACTIVE | Nov 21, 2012 |
| 042 | Product development, design, research, analysis, and testing services relating to apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, headphones, sound equipment, software relating to recording, transmission and reproduction of sound and/or images, and noise cancellation technology products including parts, fittings and accessories; advisory, consultancy services relating to the foregoing; all of the foregoing also available online and via the internet | ACTIVE | Nov 21, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Phitek Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Phitek Systems Limited
- Other trademarks owned by AMPHENOL PCD, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by AMPHENOL PHITEK LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Phitek Systems Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PHITEK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2024 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 23, 2024 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 21, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 11, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| May 8, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 3, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 26, 2020 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 10, 2020 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 8, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2014 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2014 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 19, 2013 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 9, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 27, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 19, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 26, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 1, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 24, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 4, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2007 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |